<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ContactPoint review ignores independent schools&#8217; concerns</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.isc.co.uk/2008/02/26/contactpoint-review-ignores-independent-schools-concerns/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.isc.co.uk/2008/02/26/contactpoint-review-ignores-independent-schools-concerns/</link>
	<description>Thoughts, views and opinion on the independent school sector</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 13:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Andy Cook</title>
		<link>http://blog.isc.co.uk/2008/02/26/contactpoint-review-ignores-independent-schools-concerns/#comment-43</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Cook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 13:10:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.isc.co.uk/2008/02/26/contactpoint-review-ignores-independent-schools-concerns/#comment-43</guid>
		<description>The above text was sent in as a letter for publication to The Daily Telegraph in response to its report on 22 Feb. it was not published. Interestingly The Daily Telegraph was the only national paper to follow up the ContactPoint announcement. Previously, The Guardian had been very active in reporting on it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The above text was sent in as a letter for publication to The Daily Telegraph in response to its report on 22 Feb. it was not published. Interestingly The Daily Telegraph was the only national paper to follow up the ContactPoint announcement. Previously, The Guardian had been very active in reporting on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
